My camera is in the shop. And it might never come back. (Well, actually, it's back now, finally — my baby is back. Yipee!
Visual art news, views & reviews in Dallas, Texas, USA
Home Index Calendar Opportunities ThEdblog Resources Feedback Reviews Google
Art by DallasArtsRevue Members How to Join SSiT Artists with Websites Visual Art Groups Contact Us
Every artwork on this page is copyright 2008
by the originating artist. No reproduction or approximation of these works
may be created in any medium for any commercial or nonprofit use without specific written permission from the artist.
DARts' new Review Index makes finding shows, artists and stories probable.
Eat Art Index Donate Art? Mary Iron Eyes memorial page
Blue Plate Special feedback to this story (will be at the bottom of this page)
A random visual trip down F707 (my digi-cam) memory lane
and a photo techy crammed ramble about maybe updating.
My camera is in the shop. And it might never come back. (Well, actually, it's back now, finally — my baby is back. Yipee!But most of the following still applies.)The initial, local (Baynard Electronics) "diagnosis" was that it would cost $800 to repair.I paid $70 for that "diagnosis." All they would say was that "the entire lens assembly needed to be replaced." They would not say what was wrong — a serious deficiency for any diagnosis, IMHO.They did, however, say that the camera was not abused or misused, two potential excuses for Sony USA not fixxing it cheap ($185.11).I probably should have just sent it to Sony and saved the $70, but ya never know. I originally thought it must be something simple that just let go.A new and updated version of my camera only costs $650, so instead of having Baynard fix it for more than that, I sent it to the Sony repair facility in Pennsylvania. I've heard they're quick, but I didn't know how quick.Turns out Sony was MUCH quicker — including posting it back and forth — than Baynard, who's in East Dallas. Sony's on the other side of the U.S.The repair, however, was less than perfect. I'd learned to depend on my F707's skill to number each succeeding image (up to 10,000, when the numbers rolled back to zero like a car's oddometer) to precisely locate any shot. I kept the numbers on the images and usually gave them verbal clues, too.The "repaired" camera now resets the numbers each time I download the latest images, refusing to count them serially, making it much more difficult to track down individual frames.It also opens too wide when it auto focuses in the dark, startling me each time. And when I zoom in on an exposed image still in the camera, the zoom jumps like a cheap digital camera.I've begun to think of my trusty F707 as a camera dearly in need of being replaced.And, worse, I am doubting Sony's ability to repair its own cameras well. One of my clients asked if I was sure I wanted to get another Sony, considering the lousy quality of my supposedly repaired F707. I immediately dismissed the notion then. But now I'm wondering.So the editor of this online rag was doing without his — [my] visual memory. When I visit an art show, I take digital photographs of everything that looks interesting. I usually shoot the i.d. tags, too, so I have all I need to present work on these pages.Lately, I've been shooting a lot of detail shots, to show the more intimate art details. Art is more than just what you can see at a distance.How I remember that art best is by looking at my photographs of the visit. No photos = not much memory. Usually, the words come almost directly from the digital images, which, in turn remind me what were my initial, in-gallery responses.
Compton will teach Introduction to Digital Photography at DallasDarkroom 6:30 to 9:30 Monday evenings from September 15 through October 20. It costs $285.
Whether you are just begining or a seasoned photographer, this class is for you. Learn digital photography from the ground up from a long-time practitioner of the medium (since 1991).
Six class meetings will cover the PROs and CONs of digital cameras vs film; uploading images from the camera to the computer; using gizmos and cables, manipulating images to print or use on the Internet; improving your chances of a great photograph; and answering and questions you have.
The class will include assignments, student projects and group discussions of work.
A laptop or portable computer would be very helpful (but not strictly required).
Students must have a digital camera, an e-mail account, software and cables for uploading images from camera to computer. (Bring those to the second class, if you're not sure how.)
For more information visit these links:
I used to write reviews on my NEC 8201 laptop while sitting in galleries watching the art. That laptop was the first laptop imported into the US. It predated even the Radio Shack models, which greatly resembled it. Now, it seems like everybody has a clamshell laptop — the illegitimate great grandchildren of my 8201, which quit decades ago.Old timers may remember me clicking away at the keyboard in darkened halls during art lectures in the 80s, when DARts was on paper.I had actually sponged the keys, so they were quiet. It was so nice to get accurate quotes without having them burried in non-random access audio tape. I could actually read my typing. My writing is much less legible.
For awhile, I avoided attending galleries, centers or studios. Why bother, if I couldn't remember anything and then I couldn't talk about what I've seen? Alas! I no longer have the excuse.
There is, for prime example, a wonderful example of Blue Plate Special art in the foyer of the Creative Arts Center (I do their website) that desperately needs photographing and promoting, it is so fine. A stereotypical brightly uniformed, chunky waitress hoists a blue rimmed plate aloft — as if through a crowded cafe — with a big ole' piece of pie on it. Wonderful character, great sculpture. Impressive, fun. By Dallas sculptor and CAC teacher Bobbe Gentry.It will be much more impressive as a photo than as this pile of words.You can see it on the first page of the Creative Arts Center website.
The newer model of my trusted Sony DSC-F707 is the DSC-F717 and — as much as I lust for it, the 828 has just been announced. The 717 is newer and improved-er than my 707 — and much more inexpensive than my 707 was ($1,000) or the 828 will be ($1,200). The 717, at least, has long since got all the new model bugs worked out. And for half the price, it's still beckoning...
The 828 will be full priced for too long a while after it's introduced. Almost inevitably it will be plagued by some gnatty little bugs Sony didn't think were important enough to delay the new model for. But that the very well organized online Sony digital camera community will clamor about — and make up annoying acronyms for — until they fix.
We are all of us the beta testers of this world.
Check out the absurd reds in some of the photographs of sculpture at Hall Office Park for examples of the too-red red of my previous digital camera, the lowly Kodak DC-50.The red sensitivity of the 707 was never that bad. And I've long since learned how to repair it easily.
So, if the question is: Should I just fix my 707, the anwer is a simple Yes: I already paid the $185.11 Sony Standard Repair Fee for consumer units (apparently of anything — TVs, nukers, cameras) less than 7 years old. And 24-something to UPS it to PA. Luckily it got FedExed back within 20 minutes (early) of its over-weekend, projected delivery time.But should I Buy a 717? I'm hoping not. I'm gonna take special care of my 707 baby till the 828 calms down its price and ups its suitability.Or wait for the 828? I hope so, but there's too little data, yet, too. Although the digital camera sites are dingy with all the 828's fabulous new whistles and bells.As Kathy told me last week — and I've told others countless times, there'll always be a newer, better model any time you buy anything technical.Kathy also keeps insisting that I need a backup camera. Probably at least in part so she won't have to listen to me braying on about these camera conundra of mine.My tentative contingency plan is to use my 707 carefully, then wait and see what the web says about the 828 by early or mid next year.
If the 828 is still way too expensive, I'll pick off the 717, which will be even further discounted, once Sony's new flagship digital still camera is announced.Partly Truth & Partly Fiction:
828 Rumor vs. Fact:
- an 8:1 optical zoom (fabulous for shooting birds at the lake). The 07 is only 5:1. Turns out the 828's zoom is only 7:1 and that's from a somewhat wider, 28mm wide angle, so the tele end is only slightly "longer" than the 707.
- 8 megapixels (the 707 has 5, and I can now make gorgeous 13 x 19 inch prints that show no pixelization) now — more megapixels means I'll be able to crop to smaller portions of a full frame shots and still not pixillate. It's very difficult to get flying birds to fill up the frame. Yep, 8 mp.
- a higher fastest shutter speed: The 707's is 1,000th; the 717's is 2,000th. I think I remember reading about one camera's 20,000th of a second shutter speed, but maybe I was dreaming. The 828 only has 1/2,000th. Not bad, but no cigar.
- as wide an aperture as the 707 and 717's f/2 (the better for shooting in Available Darkness without a flash, as I'd almost always rather). Same f/2 at wide angle and normal and a still very wide f/2.8 at telephoto (pretty amazing for that wide to tele zoom range.
- maybe even an optical image stabilizer, so I won't have to carry around a tri- or mono-pod to keep the new, longer telephoto shots steady. No stabilizer. But not much longer than the 707/717, so it's not necessary. A 35mm equivalent 200mm lens is very hand-holdable.
- an even better White Balance, so I can take accurate color images in galleries and walls whose light colors change inch by inch. The 707's is wonderful. No change in the 717. The 828 has more clicks.
- The 828 will also have significantly improved color and speed.When I try to explain this stuff to Kathy as the inevitable part of my decision making, she glazes over even more than I do when she attempts to differentiate this Cerulean Blue from that one. Or oil from acrylics.Very probably, the new super duper digital camera will (does) start up faster, shoot bursts faster (my 707 is spiteful about bursts — I know where and when the first shot goes off because I can see where I'm pointing the camera when that happens. But subsequent exposures happen when the camera is good and ready and in the dark. After exposure #1, it blacks the viewfinder just to keep me guessing where the subject has flown off to.
The 828 is much faster and offers a choice at burst speeds: Viewfinder blackout for even faster bursts, or slightly slower (but faster than the 717 or 707) with continuous EVF (electronic view finder) viewing.I'm saving my money up. The 828 will cost $1,200 at the beginning. Maybe down to less than a grand by the 6-month bug out level.
Sony USA fixed my old F707 by replacing the lens, the front element of which is smooth and clean. I should take this opportunity to buy and attach a clear filter to protect it from the scratches and scathes my old lens had acquired in almost two years of use).
What one book (The Complete Guide to Digital Cameras for Dummies [absurd organization but lots of good — and some bad — info] ) calls "The Dirty Little Secret of Digital Cameras" is the fact that the delay between shots or before the first exposure can be sometimes substantial. The camera takes its own sweet time thinking about all those variables — shutter speed, aperture, focus, where it's gonna store all those pesky little pixels, etc.
So newer cameras will take more pictures, faster. My formerly trusty-rusty 707 often delays as much as a a couple of seconds or more, and sometimes simply never does shoot, even while I'm frantically jabbing the shutter button.It can be maddening.
Blue Plate Special Seeks Blue Plate Art
Creative Arts Center of Dallas, the venerable East Dallas art school for adults, seeks donations of blue plate themed art for its Blue Plate Special art auction Saturday, September 20. The benefit auction will raise funds for much needed building improvements and expanded classes.
For the first time, this year, donated works will be judged — by Cheryl and Kevin Vogel of Valley House Gallery.
Cash prizes of $500 and $1,000 will be awarded to winners in both amateur and professional categories.
Advance tickets are $40 per person through Creative Arts Center or $50 per person at the door. Ticket prices include dinner; a cash bar will be available.
Join Melissa de Carlo, Rebecca Boatman, Marian Hirsch, Andrea Rosenberg, Pamela Nelson and 40 other artists who have donated work. Some of the art donated may be seen on the CAC Website Events Page.
Art will be accepted until September 15.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]